3 ms·

This probably isn't really a good analogy. It's just a fact that for most people, a conversation is more engaging than an academic paper. It's easier to pay att

This probably isn't really a good analogy. It's just a fact that for most people, a conversation is more engaging than an academic paper. It's easier to pay attention to it, and it's easier to retain the information in it. This might be healthy food that tastes like a snack.

mdp2021 2y ago
> a conversation is more engaging than an academic paper I certainly agree with you, but it has to be quality conversation. The example provided could suggest "think at what we could achieve" in an outcome that shows "and that is what could possibly go wrong".