30 ms·
This is just a "no true Scotsman" take. Popular music has already been synthetic and souless for decades now. People will listen to what sounds good to them, a
by Workaccount2 2y ago
This is just a "no true Scotsman" take.
Popular music has already been synthetic and souless for decades now. People will listen to what sounds good to them, and we already know the bar is very low, and that the hard truth is that it is all subjective anyway.
- jazzypants 2y agoSure, bars and restaurants will have an endless supply of boring music, but no one is ever going to go to an AI music event.
- Workaccount2 2y agoRead it and weep: https://www.nydailynews.com/2016/05/29/thousands-of-new-yorkers-came-out-to-see-japanese-pop-star-hatsune-miku-an-anime-hologram-that-sold-out-twice-in-the-same-night/ https://www.nydailynews.com/2016/05/29/thousands-of-new-york...
- jazzypants 2y agoThe music is written by human beings and the animation is done by human beings. You just proved my point for me. https://legacy.iftf.org/future-now/article-detail/making-miku/ https://legacy.iftf.org/future-now/article-detail/making-mik...
- agentultra 2y agoMore of a behavioural science take. Is music the sound that is played or the people making the sound? We’ve had software accompaniment for a long time. Elevator music. The same 4 chords arranged in similar ways for decades. Hasn’t destroyed music. Neither will AI. At some point people are going to want to know who’s on the other side making the music. Unless your argument is that nobody values artists… which is I guess one of the primary conceits of GenAI enthusiasts today.