3 ms·
I'm surprised to see HTMX as part of the front end stack. I like the idea of HTMX a lot, but I always got the impression it wasn't widely adopted. Do people use
by seneca 2y ago
I'm surprised to see HTMX as part of the front end stack. I like the idea of HTMX a lot, but I always got the impression it wasn't widely adopted. Do people use it for production applications often?
- sleepytimetea 2y agoI discarded the HTMX stuff - the rest of the framework is nicely put together. The ability to queue worker items to asynx workers as well as the ability to add CLI commands to CRUD on the DB helped get a project going in quick time.
- j45 2y agoThis is how things get adopted, it's not usually overnight. HTMX has been more than good enough all along for the applications it can help with.
- ecshafer 2y agoI don't use HTMX, but I use Turbo (which is what htmx is based on) in Rails daily for web apps that are in production at scale. Its in my opinion the future of web development.
- recursivedoubts 2y agohtmx was not based on turbo: it was based on intercooler.js, which was released in 2013. At that time only turbolinks existed. intercooler.js was based on the jquery load() method, pjax and angular 1’s use of attributes.