> lit-html is much better and based on existing browser APIs. Ah yes. A new framework with its own custom DSL, its own custom hook, sorry, "directive" rules, i

> lit-html is much better and based on existing browser APIs. Ah yes. A new framework with its own custom DSL, its own custom hook, sorry, "directive" rules, it's own incompatible flavor of SSR is definitely the way to go, and whould be a part of the standard unlike Polymer before it which was also touted as the bee's knees. > We should make it part of the webcomponents spec! Which is a work in progress: Whatever the outcome of that discussion, it won't be lit.