Crowley against Crowley? Good grief, this is why no one who knows anything has any use for that damned old self-promoter of a fraud. People read him as if he ha

Crowley against Crowley? Good grief, this is why no one who knows anything has any use for that damned old self-promoter of a fraud. People read him as if he had anything to say other than on how to impress bored socialites, and here we end up with somebody who doesn't even seem to realize he has constructed an argument against postmodernism that requires a postmodern reading to work. You'd be happier with the neo-Orthodox, I suspect, some of whom at least are not total charlatans. You should read Paul Kingsnorth in particular, who gives a much better account of the ideology you and he share; I would not normally make such a recommendation, but you'll believe what you believe in either case, and at least from him you'll see how a consistent account of it may be given.