> Nothing to do with "postmodernist excesses" or whatever. To clarify, I wasn't implying you or Brin were commiting "postmodernist excesses". The part of the r

> Nothing to do with "postmodernist excesses" or whatever. To clarify, I wasn't implying you or Brin were commiting "postmodernist excesses". The part of the review I quoted was explicitly saying that the book aims to correct misunderstandings that "by no means represent postmodernist excesses, but rather come to mind naturally to many people with very different backgrounds".