> but until we start programming by natural selection I wouldn't describe it as a good paradigm for organizing behavior. But aren't we? The modern ML revolutio

> but until we start programming by natural selection I wouldn't describe it as a good paradigm for organizing behavior. But aren't we? The modern ML revolution is programming via natural selection. Emergent behaviour from complex interactions of simple components trained by selection. And of course, experience underlines how hard these programmes are to reason about. However, seems to me, the key trick of these systems is that very complexity that makes them so hard to understand is what gives them their computational power.