3 ms·
I would disagree it's trying to be a "quality" podcast. As usual with AI, it's an average over averages, incredibly mediocre, sometimes borderline satire. For i
by deng 2y ago
I would disagree it's trying to be a "quality" podcast. As usual with AI, it's an average over averages, incredibly mediocre, sometimes borderline satire. For instance, in this example podcast they say "and trust me, guys, you wanna hear all about this", which is where I would usually turn off, because nothing of quality can come after this sentence.
In my company, HR now uses AI to do training videos. It's hilariously funny, because it looks like a satire on training videos (well, granted, it's funny for a minute or two, then it shifts to annoying).
- jeremyjh 2y agoThat's actually a really good application of AI, because the quality of the content is meaningless as long as it hits the bullet points. They only do this to check a box that training on <topic> was done.
- 12_throw_away 2y agoRight? The fact that the LLM output is indistinguishable from a podcast says more about podcasts than about LLMs. If anything, listening to that reminded me of why I stopped listening to podcasts in the first place - every 5 second snippet of something interesting ends up suffocated by 5 minutes of filler and dead air.