> So this now turns out (according to this post) to be a transphobic dispute. Not about competing companies, competing ideologies and competing views of sex and

> So this now turns out (according to this post) to be a transphobic dispute. Not about competing companies, competing ideologies and competing views of sex and gender. This blog post clearly does not say that. The author already disliked Matt before the past few days and is trying to illustrate a pattern of him being generally unpleasant in two otherwise unconnected events.