2 ms·
I see... so Racket is the most likely choice for work. Obviously won't use it for my office though, considering Scheme devs here are practically... zero. Or pr
by anta40 2y ago
I see... so Racket is the most likely choice for work.
Obviously won't use it for my office though, considering Scheme devs here are practically... zero.
Or probably I'll just use Scheme for learning compiler dev :) :D
- jfoutz 2y agoThis is readable and interesting - https://legacy.cs.indiana.edu/~dyb/papers/3imp.pdf https://legacy.cs.indiana.edu/~dyb/papers/3imp.pdf Dybvig's dissertation (he wrote chez scheme) it's easy to follow. IMHO, it's a lot easier to write compilers in Haskell or ocaml, for a bunch of reasons. you might take a look at https://wespiser.com/writings/wyas/00_overview.html https://wespiser.com/writings/wyas/00_overview.html which walks through writing a scheme implementation in Haskell. Do what's fun. I think both of those are worth poking at.
- anta40 2y agoAh seems fascinating. Bookmarked.