3 ms·

Seriously, hardcore history? I dont even remember where I heard from him, but I think it was a Lex podcast. So I checked out hardcore history and was mightily

by lynx23 2y ago

Seriously, hardcore history? I dont even remember where I heard from him, but I think it was a Lex podcast. So I checked out hardcore history and was mightily disappointed. To my ears, he is rambling 3 hours about a topic, more or less unstructured and very long-winded, so that I basically remember nothing after having finished the podcast. I tried several times again, because I wanted it to be good. But no, not the format for me, and not a presentation I can actually absorb.

emsixteen 2y ago
Don't worry, you're not alone. I can't remember what I didn't like about it, but I really wasn't a fan. Thankfully there's plenty out there I am a fan of!
phreeza 2y ago
Yea there are much better examples of quality history podcasts, that are non-rambling. E.g. Mike Duncan podcasts (Revolutions, History of Rome), or the Age of Napoleon podcast. But even those are really just very good digestions of various source materials, which seems like something where LLMs will eventually reach quite a good level.
- deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]
- OutOfHere 2y ago
  For such historical topics, my LLM-based software podgenai does a pretty good job imho. It is easier for it since it's all internal knowledge that it already knows about.
- triceratops 2y ago
  It's interesting I have the exact opposite opinion. I'm sure Mike Duncan works very hard, and does a ton of research, and his skill is beyond anything I can do. But his podcasts ultimately sound like a list of bullet points being read off a Google Doc. There's no color, personality, or feeling. I might as well have a screen reader narrate a Wikipedia article to me. I can barely remember anything I heard by him. Carlin on the other hand, despite the digressions and rambling, manages to keep you engaged and really feel the events.
Hammershaft 2y ago
Hardcore History can certainly be off kilter, and the first eppy of any series tends to be a slog as he finds his groove. That said, Wrath of the Khans, Fall of the Republic, and the WW1 series do blossom into being incredible gripping series.
dr_dshiv 2y ago
Try “fall of civilizations.” Best pod I know. Maybe Shwep.net
- krzyk 2y ago
  Interesting stuff, but the music and the well, falls are quite depressing.
refurb 2y ago
Yes! I’m a huge history buff (read hundreds of books) and was so excited when someone told me about Hardcore History. I tried a few episodes. I really tried. I couldn’t do it. It reminded me of my uncle would tell a 5 min story in half an hour. The dramatic filler, breathless story telling was too much for me. If anything it would put me to sleep. I’ve found a few history podcasts that I think go into a lot more depth and I learn a lot more from.
speckx 2y ago
I, too, found hardcore history a bit unstructured. If you like history, take a look at https://fallofcivilizationspodcast.com/ https://fallofcivilizationspodcast.com/.

by lynx23 2y ago

emsixteen 2y ago

Don't worry, you're not alone. I can't remember what I didn't like about it, but I really wasn't a fan. Thankfully there's plenty out there I am a fan of!

phreeza 2y ago

Yea there are much better examples of quality history podcasts, that are non-rambling. E.g. Mike Duncan podcasts (Revolutions, History of Rome), or the Age of Napoleon podcast. But even those are really just very good digestions of various source materials, which seems like something where LLMs will eventually reach quite a good level.

deleted 2y ago
[deleted]
OutOfHere 2y ago
For such historical topics, my LLM-based software podgenai does a pretty good job imho. It is easier for it since it's all internal knowledge that it already knows about.
triceratops 2y ago
It's interesting I have the exact opposite opinion. I'm sure Mike Duncan works very hard, and does a ton of research, and his skill is beyond anything I can do. But his podcasts ultimately sound like a list of bullet points being read off a Google Doc. There's no color, personality, or feeling. I might as well have a screen reader narrate a Wikipedia article to me. I can barely remember anything I heard by him. Carlin on the other hand, despite the digressions and rambling, manages to keep you engaged and really feel the events.

Hammershaft 2y ago

Hardcore History can certainly be off kilter, and the first eppy of any series tends to be a slog as he finds his groove. That said, Wrath of the Khans, Fall of the Republic, and the WW1 series do blossom into being incredible gripping series.

dr_dshiv 2y ago

Try “fall of civilizations.” Best pod I know. Maybe Shwep.net

krzyk 2y ago
Interesting stuff, but the music and the well, falls are quite depressing.

refurb 2y ago

Yes! I’m a huge history buff (read hundreds of books) and was so excited when someone told me about Hardcore History. I tried a few episodes. I really tried. I couldn’t do it. It reminded me of my uncle would tell a 5 min story in half an hour. The dramatic filler, breathless story telling was too much for me. If anything it would put me to sleep. I’ve found a few history podcasts that I think go into a lot more depth and I learn a lot more from.

speckx 2y ago

I, too, found hardcore history a bit unstructured. If you like history, take a look at https://fallofcivilizationspodcast.com/ https://fallofcivilizationspodcast.com/.