3 ms·
Not enough of a change from the existing SQLite 3. What I'd like to see most is trivial interoperability with JSON. Almost all the code I write that goes near
by rogerbinns 14y ago
Not enough of a change from the existing SQLite 3.
What I'd like to see most is trivial interoperability with JSON. Almost all the code I write that goes near SQLite has a trip through JSON as well and it gets tedious mapping between them. This also means being able to support things like a value being a list which Postgres can do.
Other than that a way of doing offline mode and online synchronization builtin. CouchDB tried to address this space, but wasn't practical to integrate into most products.
- gcp 14y agoThis really sounds like the kind of thing that is perfectly doable outside the SQLite 3 core.
- rogerbinns 14y agoWhich bit? Be able to do lists and a flexible schema would have to be part of the core. Being able to do synchronization can be done outside of the core, but is fiddly and error prone. It is far better done as a fundamental part of the database.