> but "reasonable care" and "unreasonable risk" are not problematic. Still strongly disagree, at least when it comes to AI legislation. Yes, I fully realize th

> but "reasonable care" and "unreasonable risk" are not problematic. Still strongly disagree, at least when it comes to AI legislation. Yes, I fully realize that there are "reasonableness" standards in lots of places of US jurisprudence, but when it comes to AI, given how new the tech is and how, perhaps more than any other recent technology, it is largely a "black box", meaning we don't really know how it works and we aren't really sure what its capabilities will ultimately be, I don't think anybody really knows what "reasonableness" means in this context.