3 ms·
I think we already knew this though. Because the Turing test was passed by Eliza in the 1960's. PARRY was even better and not even a decade later. For some reas
by godelski 2y ago
I think we already knew this though. Because the Turing test was passed by Eliza in the 1960's. PARRY was even better and not even a decade later. For some reason people still talk about Chess performance as if Deep Blue didn't demonstrate this. Hell, here's even Feynman talking about many of the same things we're discussing today, but this was in the 80's
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKWGGDXe5MA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKWGGDXe5MA
- fidotron 2y agoTen years ago I was explaining to halls of appalled academic administrators that AI would be replacing them before a robot succeeds in sorting out their socks.
- eli_gottlieb 2y agoThe field of AI needs to be constantly retaught the lesson that being able to replace important and powerful people doesn't mean your AI is actually intelligent. It means that important and powerful people were doing bullshit jobs.
- matthewdgreen 2y agoELIZA passed the Turing test in the same way a spooky halloween decoration can convince people that ghosts are real.
- famouswaffles 2y agoEliza did not pass the Turing Test in any meaningful way. In fact, it did not pass it at all, and saying it did and comparing both is pretty disingenuous.
- chipsrafferty 2y agoFor real, even the 2023/2024 articles about chat bots passing the Turing test are pretty disingenuous. The research methods are extremely flawed.