3 ms·
Still researching trust. It's the deepest philosophical rabbit hole I've ever fallen down, but am now coming up for air.
by nonrandomstring 2y ago
Still researching trust. It's the deepest philosophical rabbit hole
I've ever fallen down, but am now coming up for air.
- dr_dshiv 2y agoDiverse opinions and even conflict in small groups can be productive provided there is trust. I’d love to understand trust better. Got anything to share or places to start? I’ve been on a deep dive on the philosophy of harmony for a long time. Just submitted my second major article on “harmony of opposites” that deals with the role of conflict/tension in harmony.
- nonrandomstring 2y ago> philosophy of harmony Very interesting! Alignment of interest and principles of conflict resolution and diplomacy are where I got to with "dynamic trust systems" at the moment. The whole project is to kinda push "beyond authentication". Yes I'd love to share some as I've been seeking proof-readers in some security communities. If you DM me via cybershow,uk (email in footer) we can chat.
- jll29 2y agofrom a someone'S slide from the 1970s: "Knowledge of origin creates trust. Knowledge of capabilities creates trust." I'd add "a mental model of someone's motives creates trust".
- nonrandomstring 2y agoBoth of these! And spot on with (mutual) motive analysis to come up with an "alignment" matrix. I was inspired some time ago by Stella Rimington's writing (ex MI5 chief) that "identity" is actually a very poor basis for trust and authentication. It's unnerving watching the whole zero-trust show organise itself around notions of strong identity (as opposed to role and earned trust), which might turn out to be a rather silly thing to do.