4 ms·
This is simply not true, and has never been true anywhere I've worked. We can do everything with a much better UX in about 2,000 to 3,000 lines of code, instead
by arp242 2y ago
This is simply not true, and has never been true anywhere I've worked. We can do everything with a much better UX in about 2,000 to 3,000 lines of code, instead of ~25,000 (and almost 2,000 dependencies).
It's a boring tedious "true-ism" that keeps getting pounded. I don't really know what else to say, but it's simply just not true.
- bdangubic 2y agoWhat is the longest you have ever worked on a single piece of software? If you are in some sort of consultancy or jump jobs every 2-3 years it most definitely won't be true. You stay with a product for 5+ years it is bound to happen unless your dev shop is like 10 people. If you think this is not true AND have spent 5+ years with the same piece of software you are an outlier...