4 ms·
> My argument is against the idea that 18-25 year olds would be buying this for $750 I agree but it's only $300. As I said before, I think it should be $200.
by detst 14y ago
> My argument is against the idea that 18-25 year olds would be buying this for $750
I agree but it's only $300. As I said before, I think it should be $200.
> Windows Media Center, MythTV [...] using your bluetooth/IR remote control isn't exactly an inelegant solution
I was using MythTV years ago, so I'm not personally disagreeing but the average person would violently disagree.
You can argue for Apple's solution but that's not really my point. My point is that this thing (especially at $200) is a much better solution than anything involving a desktop computer and that directly connecting speakers is a nice feature. Additionally, look at how easy it is to play a/v from your friends' phone or tablet without any setup; it just works and doesn't require any wires.
@rdl:
If it really does add $100, I'd be nice to see it as an optional feature but I stand by the utility of the feature.
- freehunter 14y agoI agree but it's only $300. As I said before, I think it should be $200 Unless you want the speakers and speaker cables they're selling with it, the speakers are $400 and the cables are $50 for two.