> You are adding more problems that don't exist to the specification. D-Bus does in fact already have support for remoting, and like I said, you can tunnel it

> You are adding more problems that don't exist to the specification. D-Bus does in fact already have support for remoting, and like I said, you can tunnel it today. I'm only suggesting it because I have in fact tunneled D-Bus over the network to call into systemd specifically, already! > As for strings, just shove a char[4096] in there. Use a bit of memory to save a lot of parsing. OK. So... waste an entire page of memory for each string. And then we avoid all of that parsing, but the resulting code is horribly error-prone. And then it still doesn't work if you actually want really large strings, and it also doesn't do much to answer arrays of other things like structures. Can you maybe see why this is compelling to virtually nobody?