4 ms·
I assume that all data the commercial providers have on you, the government can access too if they would like to. Probably the government is even happy they can
by red_admiral 2y ago
I assume that all data the commercial providers have on you, the government can access too if they would like to. Probably the government is even happy they can "outsource" a lot of data collection.
- dartos 2y agoThis exactly. I’m glad I’m not the only one who thinks like this.
- OutOfHere 2y agoActually, much of the commercially collected evidence is not strong in court if it is admissible in court at all. One can simply reject it claiming that it is a mis-association, but only if there isn't further objective data that conclusively ties one to the collection. In practice, usually the government finds evidence that is more directly incriminating, and the the commercial evidence is then secondary to the case.
- nullc 2y agoIt would be nice if it were true, but it's absolutely admissible via whatever employee of the commercial source they bring in as a witness to testify that it is super duper reliable.