6 ms·
This is systemd we’re talking about. A service manager that already mucks with mount namespaces. It would be quite straightforward to map a capability-like UNI
by amluto 2y ago
This is systemd we’re talking about. A service manager that already mucks with mount namespaces.
It would be quite straightforward to map a capability-like UNIX socket into each service’s filesystem and give it a private view of the world. But instead…
> Public varlink interfaces are registered system-wide by their well-known address, by default /run/org.varlink.resolver. The resolver translates a given varlink interface to the service address which provides this interface.
…we have well known names, and sandboxing, or replacing a service for just one client, remains a mess. Sigh.
- guappa 2y agoPlease, your trolling is not really welcome. > It would be quite straightforward to map a capability-like UNIX socket into each service’s filesystem and give it a private view of the world. But instead… Can you link to your PR where you solved the problem?