3 ms·
If they say they will destroy it, then I later find it wasn't destroyed and it was used in some way that was harmful to me, doesn't that make the company massiv
by accrual 2y ago
If they say they will destroy it, then I later find it wasn't destroyed and it was used in some way that was harmful to me, doesn't that make the company massively liable?
That's the only reassurance I have. It would be like illegally collected evidence. Sure, you may have some evidence (my DNA), but it's not admissible because you're not supposed to have had access to it.
- neilv 2y agoIIUC, there are hard rules about admissibility of evidence, and you're aware when an attempt is made to use evidence that way, and have an opportunity to argue it, in a very enforceable way. Are there analogous rules around the DNA sent to 23andMe, would you have an enforceable opportunity to block uses of that, and would you even know when they're using it that way?