3 ms·
it's on the side of their head and its very small and hardly noticeable. This is on your face. In front of your eyes and it's very noticeable. They need to par
by rbn 14y ago
it's on the side of their head and its very small and hardly noticeable.
This is on your face. In front of your eyes and it's very noticeable. They need to partner with fashion brands and put this on real fashionable glasses/sunglasses. Imagine Versace with Google Glass.
- cheald 14y agoOne of the things that struck me while they were doing the "fashion demo" was that if they made it symmetric (even with just a plastic facade on the other side), it'd be a lot more pleasing to look at. I'm sure we'll see styles like that.
- rbn 14y agoI agree. However, G-Glass is a bigger cross between fashion and tech than regular smartphones. IMHO the G-Glass should just be a monitor+camera for your phone. I think manufacturing it will be much easier and the the size of the system will be smaller which will allow people use G-Glass without anyone even noticing. Like people can go buy regular sunglasses for $100 and the G-Glass version would cost i don't know $200.
- potatolicious 14y agoI disagree. Asymmetry has for a long time been a staple of fashion: http://famecherry.com/fashionista-now/fashionista-now-the-asymmetrical-fashion-trend-bringing-class-style-to-the-equation/ http://famecherry.com/fashionista-now/fashionista-now-the-as... Google may or may not be able to propel Glass into being a fashion icon - but if they fail I really don't think the device being asymmetrical will have anything to do with it.