Honestly looking at the paper there are enough statistically significant benefits to make this societally worthwhile and even more statistically insignificant b

Honestly looking at the paper there are enough statistically significant benefits to make this societally worthwhile and even more statistically insignificant but uniquely important to each participant that this seems like a no brainer to continue. "GI recipients were significantly more likely to secure full-time employment than to remain unemployed not looking for work, compared to control participants across the duration of the pilot." "The treatment group demonstrated a significant decrease in food insecurity and an increase in health-promoting behaviors." "Far more GI recipients reported that their children participated in enrichment activities, such as sports, lessons, and clubs, than control participants. At Baseline, approximately 44% of the treatment group (vs. 40% control) had their children in at least one enrichment activity" Secondary effect of positive life conditions for dependents isn't even quantified in any of the research or other comments in this thread, that starts to compound the benefit.