3 ms·
Sorry I fail to see your point. Is it that conflating chicks and chickens is good enough performance?
by JCharante 2y ago
Sorry I fail to see your point. Is it that conflating chicks and chickens is good enough performance?
- fragmede 2y agoThe question is for what. For the level of interaction that many day-to-day tasks require, ChatGPT meets that. When you’re going grocery shopping, how often do you get stopped at the door by a security guard who won’t let you pass unless you answer their riddle? The A in AI stands for artificial, so it’s going to look different than human intelligence but we’re at a point where I can throw some words at the computer and it will generate an essay for me relevant to the words I threw at it. It may not get every little detail right, but I’m amazed by that because I’ve had meaningful interactions with humans via text whom wouldn’t have caught the chicks versus chickens gotcha. Is ChatGPT an all knowing and infallible oracle? Clearly not. But holding it to a higher standard than we hold other humans to is a unfair test of its abilities.