4 ms·
The most likely reason for war is to move the competition with China onto a military footing rather than an economic one. The US would win the first, and that
by sudjdkdn 2y ago
The most likely reason for war is to move the competition with China onto a military footing rather than an economic one. The US would win the first, and that result would help the second. If you’re seeing western powers gear up for war, it might be to secure their economic future rather than a just intervention
- FpUser 2y agoSo they would start a war and kill people for economy's sake? In this case what make them any different from any other war criminals?
- knodi 2y agoYa just don’t buy EU or UK would start ww3. There are much smarter and better economics and influence strategies to play out that are much less bloody to its own population.
- h18483djdj 2y agoIt may not make WW status and they might not be directly involved in fighting it
- h18483djdj 2y agoI think that’s the point. I’m old enough to remember Bush and Blair wanting UN support for Iraq but ditched the idea when they wouldn’t get it. And young enough that my parent’s generation have never seen a war and so don’t remember why the UN was created in the first place. We live in dangerous times with very poor leaders and politics
- benterix 2y agoYeah Bush seemed surprised nobody wants to join his war. "You forgot Poland!"