3 ms·
Not for those of us stuck in Java 8... Is it stable already?
by drowsspa 2y ago
Not for those of us stuck in Java 8... Is it stable already?
- quotemstr 2y agoI hear that some Amish sects permit the use of technology that's older and proven not to be too worldly, like washing machines, chainsaws, and Java 11. Have you considered converting?
- drowsspa 2y agoYeah... Unfortunately golden handcuffs are binding me to the financial sector and, specifically, to Hadoop
- fnord123 2y agoHadoop >=3.3 supports Java11.
- svieira 2y agoVirtual threads only became stable in Java 21, unfortunately (https://openjdk.org/jeps/444 https://openjdk.org/jeps/444). If the issue is "I'm bound to Java 8" proposing running a research build of Java 11 in production is going to fly as well as a lead balloon on the moon.
- drowsspa 2y agoEven so, it's pretty new, isn't it? I don't quite trust the claim it's completely transparent to applications and libraries...