3 ms·
I don't understand. Either you have one person on site or one person monitoring video with your expensive "no one on site" tech. I'm skeptical that this would
by fracus 2y ago
I don't understand. Either you have one person on site or one person monitoring video with your expensive "no one on site" tech. I'm skeptical that this would save anyone money. I suppose the labor for the monitoring is dirt cheap and maybe one person can monitor multiple sites? And I suppose no real employees means no HR, etc..
- lupire 2y agoSo, you do understand, since you explained it yourself. Your minor error is thinking that surveillance tech is expensive in 2020 onward.
- moralestapia 2y agoOne person monitoring in the US: $30/hour One person monitoring in the Philippines: $2/hour
- beachy 2y ago$2 per hour and monitoring 20 screens simultaneously.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]