4 ms·
Yes but they’re also anonymous. You don’t have your name attached to the account and there’s no paperwork/bank that’s keeping track of any large/irregular finan
by camus21 2y ago
Yes but they’re also anonymous. You don’t have your name attached to the account and there’s no paperwork/bank that’s keeping track of any large/irregular financial transactions
- snovv_crash 2y agoSo, exactly like cash?
- mrbungie 2y agoYeah, exactly, but with the energy requirements of a small country to run the network.
- mptest 2y agoNo, not exactly. If you know someone used cash at one place can you track every cash transaction they've ever made? If you know one bitcoin transaction from a wallet you can track everything that key pair has done from genesis to present. So, if anything, it's worse.
- CharlieDigital 2y agoNot quite because there are logistical challenges to moving large quantities of physical money.
- al_borland 2y agoI heard this as one of the early sales pitches for Bitcoin. “Digital cash.” That all seemed to go out the window when companies developed wallets to simplify the process for the average user, and when the prices surged, some started requiring account verification to tie it to a real identity. At that point, it’s just a bank with a currency that isn’t broadly accepted. The idea of digital cash was effectively dead, at least for the masses who aren’t going to take the time to figure out how to use Bitcoin without a 3rd party involved. Cash is simple.
- mptest 2y agoThey're pseudonymous. Not anonymous. Big difference. Monero transactions are anonymous.