4 ms·
>I believe you, but how did you engage them? From the article, it seems the engagement came in the form of DMCA take-down requests from university lawyers... w
by ProllyInfamous 2y ago
>I believe you, but how did you engage them?
From the article, it seems the engagement came in the form of DMCA take-down requests from university lawyers... which the publication then largely ignored for a considerable period of time (possibly due to counter-DMCA).
In an unrelated scientific field, EE, I recently witnessed how the DMCA process could be used by an "engineer" to silence criticism of his hybrid vehicle battery "upgrades" [2] — similar to Australian company DCS's snafu/lawsuit [1].
Just disgusting, these vultures that know [how to steal/lie/obfuscate] just well-enough to be dangerous... including how to manipulate our DMCA system to their dishonest advantage.
[1] youtube.com/watch?v=_QNMVMlx48E&pp
[2] theautopian.com/toyota-prius-owners-can-soon-swap-tired-old-batteries-for-sodium-ion-cells-but-drama-rages/
- rebanevapustus 2y agoHe managed to DMCA strike the corrected version of the paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.04214 https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.04214 We then contacted Stanford, and somehow got their legal team to message Arxiv telling them that Matthew is a fraudster. In spite (!!) of Arxiv removing his stolen version thanks to Stanford's email: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.14810 https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.14810 They refused to lift the obviously spurious DMCA claim on mine.