3 ms·
A few years ago saying that there will be soon AI that perfectly understands human natural language was viewed as unrealistic science fiction. Today the possibi
by cubefox 2y ago
A few years ago saying that there will be soon AI that perfectly understands human natural language was viewed as unrealistic science fiction. Today the possibility of an AI god is regarded as unrealistic science fiction.
- futureshock 2y agoI keep watching old Star Trek TNG episodes and the way Data and the ship’s computer is portrayed seems to have been largely matched or even surpassed. And that was supposed to be 24th century tech that we caught up to in 35 years.
- Jensson 2y agoTodays models don't hold a candle to data, they are better at reading emotions yes but everything else they are horrible at in comparison. Sci fi writers just assumed that emotions would be hard for computers but apparently it isn't that hard at all compared to rational thinking.
- deafpolygon 2y agoWe're nowhere near Data, or ship's computer, level of AI.
- jcrash 2y agoIs this a joke?
- hobs 2y agoData has the ability to be accurate and store and index all the information, not present a lossy copy where he hallucinates.
- sonofhans 2y agoJust to clarify a few things. First, there is no AI, only LLMs. Second, no LLM understands anything at all, never mind human language. Third, no LLM operates anywhere near to perfection at any task. It is still unrealistic science fiction.
- cubefox 2y agoWishful thinking.
- snapcaster 2y agoJust to clarify a few things. First, there is no intelligence just evolved primates triggering neurons with chemicals. Second, no human understands anything at all they're just dumb machines reacting to stimulus. Third, no human operates anywhere near perfection at any task.