4 ms·
Thankfully everyone is free to use PyPy, if they consider it the better solution!
by jononor 2y ago
Thankfully everyone is free to use PyPy, if they consider it the better solution!
- v3ss0n 2y agoSplitting efforts aren't good . PyPy is decade effort of making JIT Python and they had big success. But it doesn't get the praise by the python community - and they are only doing NIH solutions again and again. (First attemped by Google and they failed - unladen python , now this experiment results dosen't sound good). Why ignore millions of dollars spent in a decade effort of fulltime PHD researchers' work and doing their own thing? Yeah NIH is helluva drug.
- kaba0 2y agoAs others have mentioned - Python exposes very low-level details to C, making plenty of optimizations invalid as programs may make use of it.