5 ms·
No, his reasoning is what he is planning to do, which feels like the js ecosystem is better suited at honestly, or at least the mobile app. - iPhone and Androi
by Alifatisk 2y ago
No, his reasoning is what he is planning to do, which feels like the js ecosystem is better suited at honestly, or at least the mobile app.
- iPhone and Android apps with parity to our web app
- Much better UX around tables/filtering/sorting
- Customizable navigation with stellar UX (like without refreshing)
- Super customizable dashboards especially for analytics
- Rendering emails dynamically using components we’ve already designed and built for the web
- Page builder-type UXes (both for marketing pages and product content)
https://xcancel.com/shl/status/1839608989073510809#m https://xcancel.com/shl/status/1839608989073510809#m
- pier25 2y agoOther than the mobile apps (which is a questionable point) all the other points don't make much sense. UX doesn't depent on the tech stack. Look at the tech stack by gov.uk for example which is probably one of the more serious UX efforts ever made. They use a bunch of stuff including Rails and Django. I believe until a couple of years ago they were still using jQuery.
- Alifatisk 2y agoTo me, the mobile app is the only point that makes sense.
- zhalz 2y agoRails already includes Turbo Native for use cases like this, though: https://turbo.hotwired.dev/handbook/native https://turbo.hotwired.dev/handbook/native
- Alifatisk 2y agoJust tried the demo https://turbo-native-demo.glitch.me https://turbo-native-demo.glitch.me it’s cool indeed, but there is something off with the interaction. Can’t really explain it.
- Alifatisk 2y agoTurbo Native is about to be deprecated I think https://native.hotwired.dev https://native.hotwired.dev