4 ms·
But that seems to be clearly not what happened in this case, at least by the explanations in the court's ruling.
by hn_throwaway_99 2y ago
But that seems to be clearly not what happened in this case, at least by the explanations in the court's ruling.
- em-bee 2y agoi didn't mean to imply that it did, just that the idea of sharing a trademark is not as ridiculous if you consider that licensing a trademark i possible and the result would mostly have been the same.