3 ms·
Edited to wal-g, since that is what I'm using now; I forgot I had to switch over, but indeed I did. Did you jump straight to pgbackrest or compare it to wal-g?
by TheDong 2y ago
Edited to wal-g, since that is what I'm using now; I forgot I had to switch over, but indeed I did.
Did you jump straight to pgbackrest or compare it to wal-g? I didn't compare em at all, so I have no clue if I'm missing out on something nice or important there
- brunoqc 2y agoI wonder if we should ditch pgbackrest now that PostgreSQL 17 has the new backup thing.
- fefferkorn 2y agoI think the next few years it will not be dead, there are a lot of instances who can not easily be ported to 17. But yeah, i also read about that new feature a few days ago.