4 ms·
So...2/3 of his tweets were accurate and factual? For social media, that's actually pretty good. I don't read the NYT regularly, but I'll bet more than 1/3 of
by bradley13 2y ago
So...2/3 of his tweets were accurate and factual? For social media, that's actually pretty good.
I don't read the NYT regularly, but I'll bet more than 1/3 of their articles are biased or missing important context.
- breadwinner 2y agoFor the owner of one of the most important social media companies that's pretty bad.
- xenospn 2y ago“60% of the time, it’s true every time!”
- Arnt 2y agoThe NYT is a subscriber newspaper. Most readers read yesterday's paper. If you want to prove that the NYT misses important context, all you need to do is to ignore the context provided by yesterday's paper. If you don't want to prove that, then maybe you should read the paper before writing what you just did.