For no good reason? I hardly think removing discrimination is not a good reason. You might mean that the financial benefits are outweighed by the financial co

For no good reason? I hardly think removing discrimination is not a good reason. You might mean that the financial benefits are outweighed by the financial cost. Look at it this way: if you have an ADA from the start, there isn't going to be some segment of the population you exclude from using your product. That's a good thing. Now, nailing on ADA compliance to something that had poor design decisions is going to be painful. In that case, the positive side is that you're going to be forced to get rid of that technical debt.