3 ms·
I have no beef with FSL. FSL is totally fine. I would just prefer to have more liability protection.
by gavinhoward 2y ago
I have no beef with FSL. FSL is totally fine.
I would just prefer to have more liability protection.
- the_mitsuhiko 2y ago> I would just prefer to have more liability protection. Would be curious what you have in mind. The FSL comes with a default no warranty disclaimer.
- gavinhoward 2y agoSpecifically, a disclaimer of duty. https://yzena.com/yzena-noncommercial-license/#no-duty https://yzena.com/yzena-noncommercial-license/#no-duty . For why, see questions 33-36 at https://yzena.com/yzena-noncommercial-license-faq/ https://yzena.com/yzena-noncommercial-license-faq/ .
- the_mitsuhiko 2y agoI'm not a lawyer but I think licenses like this have a potential to be very problematic. Even the termination clause of the GPL has turned out to be challenging and primarily is not an issue because it's being ignored / re-instantiated despite the license text. If a court however would ever rule on this, that might be problematic. (Also the fact that this license was not written by a lawyer in itself seems … less than ideal)
- gavinhoward 2y agoThat is why I need lawyer money. But I have actually gotten halfway with a lawyer. A lawyer actually wrote the No Duty clause.