4 ms·
For mainstream folks, perhaps. The second you even go slightly outside of what the media has declared kosher it goes off the rails. Take RFK’s page, for instanc
by basil-rash 2y ago
For mainstream folks, perhaps. The second you even go slightly outside of what the media has declared kosher it goes off the rails. Take RFK’s page, for instance, which is just a collection of inflamed opinions soured from “reputable“ news outlets.
- internetter 2y agoIn your opinion, what is some misinformation on RFK's page? Have you read the discussions on the talk page? If your concern has not been extensively discussed, have you raised it on said page? Here is a link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Robert_F._Kennedy_Jr https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Robert_F._Kennedy_Jr.
- basil-rash 2y agoYes, the top chain in the talk page is exactly what I’m referring. And, as expected, the fair critique of the article for violating wiki guidelines has been shot down by passionate editors who want to push their narrative.
- notsureifsrs 2y agoI'm confused. All I saw was someone trying to push their own agenda, and editors preventing it. Did you see something else?
- 3np 2y agoIt can get polarized within the mainstream, too. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_U.S._executive_branch_czars https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_U.S._executive_br...