6 ms·
Llama is good enough and I don’t have to give my data to a very sketchy organization. Happy to never use OpenAI again.
by bbqfog 2y ago
Llama is good enough and I don’t have to give my data to a very sketchy organization. Happy to never use OpenAI again.
- daghamm 2y agoNot today, but I have a feeling that 3 years from now things will look very very different.
- bbqfog 2y agoI'd say Llama has improved at a much faster clip than anything OpenAI has released, so probably in 3 years what I said will be even more true.
- slashdave 2y agoAll these models train on the same data (sort of) and so all will pretty quickly reach the same asymptote.
- logicchains 2y agoEventually they'll be put in robots able to gather real-world data live, and they'll have a practically infinite amount of video/audio/tactile data to learn from.
- slashdave 2y agoSure, but this scales rather poorly. How many robots do you expect, and don't you expect some resistance from the public, for privacy reasons at the least?
- bbqfog 2y agoI agree, I don't think there's a moat and this is going to be a commodity feature.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- manishsharan 2y agoGemini is also very cheap and comparable and works well as a drop in replacement for OpenAI models.
- freilanzer 2y agoFor me, Llama is definitely not good enough yet. At least, the one I can host isn't.
- bbqfog 2y agoTry Lambda Labs if you want to host a bigger model.