4 ms·
Mentally it's not too difficult to throw $60 at a digital "Buy" button, but it's much harder to throw those $60 at a "Get access" button. I wholly welcome a cha
by ZaoLahma 2y ago
Mentally it's not too difficult to throw $60 at a digital "Buy" button, but it's much harder to throw those $60 at a "Get access" button. I wholly welcome a change like this, even if it's just wording on the button.
One thing to worry about, perhaps, is how it might make it easier for companies to remove things that we have "Gotten access" to as it would be explicitly stated that we don't actually buy anything.
- beretguy 2y ago> One thing to worry about, perhaps, is how it might make it easier for companies to remove things that we have "Gotten access" to They are already doing it. The Crew is a good example. We are not losing anything here.
- ZaoLahma 2y agoYes, but up until now it's been (very) rare. At least for games. I fear that companies will view a change like this as a door opening wider to remove digital content as they please. Or perhaps worse, only offer strictly time-limited access with a "well, you're getting exactly what you asked for" view of it.
- beretguy 2y agoIt's not rare at all. It happens all the time, everywhere. There are hundreds of games nobody can play anymore because servers got shutdown.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- ben-schaaf 2y ago> Mentally it's not too difficult to throw $60 at a digital "Buy" button, but it's much harder to throw those $60 at a "Get access" button. This is especially true when a large number of games do have a buy button. "Get access" stands out as not being the same as buying when you've bought the rest of your game library.