3 ms·
> So instead, you trust for-profit companies to direct the morals of society? Absolutely not. I don't really have a solution, but in general it seems distribut
by komali2 2y ago
> So instead, you trust for-profit companies to direct the morals of society?
Absolutely not. I don't really have a solution, but in general it seems distributing power to more local level forms of governance works well for many things, so perhaps something along those lines?
- paulryanrogers 2y agoLocal control has limits too. In the US one can now export pollution to ones neighboring states. Las Vegas exports it's externalities by marketing to out of state populations. (Or at least they did when gambling was more heavily regulated elsewhere)
- FactKnower69 2y ago>it seems distributing power to more local level forms of governance works well for many things >CCP COMMITS GENOCIDE AGAINST UIGHUR MUSLIMS XINJIANG wow, you seem to really know what you're talking about! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_regions_of_China https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_regions_of_China
- komali2 2y agoIs your argument that Xinjiang is somehow autonomous from the CPC government? That's a very strange claim to make considering it's undeniably ruled completely by the whims of the CPC. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strike_Hard_Campaign_Against_Violent_Terrorism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strike_Hard_Campaign_Against_V... If that's not what you mean, can you help me understand what you're saying?