Really, I'm not sure what the point of your posts is. You don't like change, great for you? > arch, nix, docker, flatpak, snaps etc Lumping all of these into

Really, I'm not sure what the point of your posts is. You don't like change, great for you? > arch, nix, docker, flatpak, snaps etc Lumping all of these into the same category doesn't even make sense, other from a "they're all things invented after 2000 and I don't wanna learn anything new" perspective. > The latter will all "win" on their merits at some point and become fat and lazy themselves as they evolve and grow Can you back up your nihilism? > those companies prefer reliable, predictable and boring. They prefer what they're used to, even if it's neither reliable nor predictable due to having too many moving parts (that don't even make sense any more), and are only boring in the sense that you know exactly how wasteful and brittle they're gonna be and how much effort you will waste interacting with them. And even then, their preferences don't stop most "boring big enterprise" companies from using newer technologies, just look at docker. Your condescending false dichtomy is entirely pointless.