4 ms·
Well, I'm not sure there'd be much benefit to spending energy on a 3rd eye. You can already achieve stereoscopic vision with just two eyes, why waste the energy
by Wojtkie 2y ago
Well, I'm not sure there'd be much benefit to spending energy on a 3rd eye. You can already achieve stereoscopic vision with just two eyes, why waste the energy on a third? It probably doesn't increase fitness enough to be worth the energy spend.
- john2x 2y agoDifferent sets for different wavelength ranges
- thfuran 2y agoIt might be too hard to parse, but an eye on each arm would give variable baseline and potentially 360° stereoscopic coverage.
- SoftTalker 2y agoYet some creatures have many more than two eyes. Spiders, for example.
- notheyarent 2y agoThose are not eyes though. Animals eyes always come in a pair and whether it’s a human, dog, cat, mouse etc they are Gods gateway to the soul. It’s self evident.