4 ms·
> it used to be pretty positively received on HN Doesn’t that call into question the decision making of folks on HN rather than being a positive view of the pr
by gortok 2y ago
> it used to be pretty positively received on HN
Doesn’t that call into question the decision making of folks on HN rather than being a positive view of the product?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- bongodongobob 2y agoYep. Turns out HN is just avg people that think they're really smart because they know how to write code.
- skinnymuch 2y agoLiterally why I stopped going to the comments or commenting. The blind arrogance of tech bros is up there.
- johnnyanmac 2y agoGiven the scope of the topic it appealed in 2016, parking tickets in two specific cities, I can see such a petty case like that be automated. The expansion in 2017 to seeking refuge seems like it'd be a bigger hurdle. But I wouldn't be surprised if that process can be automated a lot as well. Seems like the killing blow here was claiming it can outright replace legal advice. Wonder how much that lie made compared to the settlement. But yes, HN in general is a lot more empathetic towards AI than what the average consensus seems to be based on surveys this year.