2 ms·
So your argument is that making computers and the internet easier to use for normal people is cause for societal destruction? I can’t be convinced, but that doe
by zer0zzz 2y ago
So your argument is that making computers and the internet easier to use for normal people is cause for societal destruction? I can’t be convinced, but that does seem like more of an indictment on people than it does tech.
- kridsdale3 2y agoHis entire argument amounts to Eternal September[1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_September https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_September
- stiray 2y agoNot my argument. You are fighting Umberto Eco (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umberto_Eco https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umberto_Eco ) here. Let me repeat him as you probably didnt catch it (I dont understand how, but this is one of the things, I dont understand, so I wont argue about it): “Social media gives legions of idiots the right to speak when they once only spoke at a bar after a glass of wine, without harming the community ... but now they have the same right to speak as a Nobel Prize winner. It's the invasion of the idiots” I can just confirm that what he has seen and described is correct. And the more that you are standing your ground, the more you are proving, he was correct.