> Even if no interpretation is perfect, raising the bar is better. Can you explain why? What metric are you using? What is the end goal? I ask because there a

> Even if no interpretation is perfect, raising the bar is better. Can you explain why? What metric are you using? What is the end goal? I ask because there are many metrics that I care about: - pace of discovery - cost of discovery - ability to work in directions that have high risk and high reward What I don't really care about - outsiders skimming over the literature, misinterpreting it, and coming to bad conclusions. Raising the "rigor" bar only seems to be positive for this metric that I don't care about.