3 ms·
On one hand you blame government red tape for preventing housing development. On the other hand you propose the government should manage housing construction a
by engineer_22 2y ago
On one hand you blame government red tape for preventing housing development.
On the other hand you propose the government should manage housing construction and administration.
It's strange to be both pro- and anti-government intervention.
Maybe you are saying local govts are stifling new housing starts, while state/federal govt should step in?
- bachmeier 2y ago> It's strange to be both pro- and anti-government intervention. It's strange to claim you either have to support or oppose all types of government intervention. There is nothing unreasonable about supporting what you view as good types of intervention while opposing what you view as bad types of intervention.
- engineer_22 2y agoI wasn't trying to insult parent, just observed some cognitive dissonance
- jmyeet 2y agoThat commenter is completely correct: you can be for one policy and against another. It's not cognitive dissonance because I'm for or against certain policies and outcomes. This isn't a team sport. The government isn't the Dallas Cowboys. Making housing unaffordable = bad. Making healthcare accessible and affordable = good. Why on earth would you think yo uhad to support the government either 0% or 100% and nothing in between? It reads like an attempt at hypocrisy baiting because you didn't like what I had to say, not that anything was actually wrong with it. I could be reading that wrong but Ithat's how it reads.
- engineer_22 2y agoYou're off the scent, but I wish you well
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- antifa 2y agoHmmm I noticed you like good things and dislike bad things, hypocrite much?
- engineer_22 2y agoantifa? is your name ironic, or you're actually one of the mob?