4 ms·

The basic idea is reasonable enough: split ownership of a vacation home among multiple owners so that they can all efficiently use it for vacations, with each c

The basic idea is reasonable enough: split ownership of a vacation home among multiple owners so that they can all efficiently use it for vacations, with each co-owner having a regular time slot assigned. But in practice the contracts around them are often predatory, with excessive financing costs and annual maintenance fees. And since it's a share that you own, you (nominally) can't get out of the fees without transferring your share to someone else. However, since the downsides have become well-known, people have sometimes found that they can't even give away their shares, let alone recoup much of their initial purchase cost.

ghaff 2y ago
Yeah. With a lot of assumptions, they can maybe work outside of financial shenanigans. But people often want to travel at the same time. They want to vary locations. If you always want to go to the same location multiple times per year and are pretty flexible about dates? Maybe?
- Retric 2y ago
  Buy a house, put it on airBnB through a management company, go to other AirBnB’s using rental income from first AirBnB. Or you could not try and run a business and simply invest nominally while paying market rate for a rental. Sharing informally between friends and family when people have vacation properties in desirable locations works better but the barriers to entry are really high.
  - ghaff 2y ago
    My parents had a vacation home in Mexico for a while that they rented out (pre-AirBnB). But, being Mexico, they had on-site staff, my mother was retired, and the whole thing still seemed way more hassle than I would have had any interest in. (Building it was also pretty much a nightmare.) I do use my brother's second home up in Maine and that works pretty well.
PaulHoule 2y ago
The thing is you can keep your money and spend it on going anywhere you want on vacation later on. It makes no sense.
- ghaff 2y ago
  Group ownership is pretty much a massive hassle. Different people have wildly different visions for things like maintenance and how a house should be outfitted. I've always taken the philosophy of putting the money in my piggy bank with no cost and obligation. Given certain circumstances, could investing in real estate been a good deal? Almost certainly. But not without risk or future obligation.

ghaff 2y ago

Yeah. With a lot of assumptions, they can maybe work outside of financial shenanigans. But people often want to travel at the same time. They want to vary locations. If you always want to go to the same location multiple times per year and are pretty flexible about dates? Maybe?

Retric 2y ago
Buy a house, put it on airBnB through a management company, go to other AirBnB’s using rental income from first AirBnB. Or you could not try and run a business and simply invest nominally while paying market rate for a rental. Sharing informally between friends and family when people have vacation properties in desirable locations works better but the barriers to entry are really high.
- ghaff 2y ago
  My parents had a vacation home in Mexico for a while that they rented out (pre-AirBnB). But, being Mexico, they had on-site staff, my mother was retired, and the whole thing still seemed way more hassle than I would have had any interest in. (Building it was also pretty much a nightmare.) I do use my brother's second home up in Maine and that works pretty well.

PaulHoule 2y ago

The thing is you can keep your money and spend it on going anywhere you want on vacation later on. It makes no sense.

ghaff 2y ago
Group ownership is pretty much a massive hassle. Different people have wildly different visions for things like maintenance and how a house should be outfitted. I've always taken the philosophy of putting the money in my piggy bank with no cost and obligation. Given certain circumstances, could investing in real estate been a good deal? Almost certainly. But not without risk or future obligation.