3 ms·
No because then it would have been the Trump Vaccine and media would have condemned it as a dangerous, untested experiment on the American people. Any side effe
by musicale 2y ago
No because then it would have been the Trump Vaccine and media would have condemned it as a dangerous, untested experiment on the American people. Any side effects would be covered 24/7. Fact checkers would point out that it doesn't convey immunity and therefore should not really qualify as a "vaccine," etc.
- Terr_ 2y ago> No because then it would have been the Trump Vaccine Nah, that prediction originates from opportunistic flip-floppers projecting their own behavior onto everybody else. Both sides are not the same. (Nor symmetric mirror images.)
- rightbyte 2y agoThe whole debacle involved a hilarious amount of flip floping and gas lighting that all the counter orders were not actually counter orders. 'Both sides' only makes sense in an US context if you pretend there are two sides. It was a 'gatekeeper' issue. Where hysterical and panicing gatekeepers tried to keep people in line. Then in the confusion predictably evolved into a 'two sides'® as done in the US of A issue, like say abortion, 'vaxxers' etc.
- h2odragon 2y agohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dAjCeMuXR0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dAjCeMuXR0