3 ms·
Although our day-to-day devices are not meant to be explosive devices (and boy, are they unstable despite our best efforts [0]). I can't help but feel like a l
by rolandog 2y ago
Although our day-to-day devices are not meant to be explosive devices (and boy, are they unstable despite our best efforts [0]). I can't help but feel like a line was crossed by whomever performed that type of supply-chain attack: they were effectively a much-more productive Unabomber.
We've been told that surely a couple of grams of explosives were at fault... My main worry (as a ChemEng who has pivoted to InfoSec) is if this was a much harder to detect combination of different battery-chemistry + firmware attack as detonator.
I confess I haven't had the time to read much more into reports but it'd be great to put that worry at hand if there's any writeup about unexploded device tear-downs.
My highest concern is the chilling effect that this can have on freedom of speech (and thought): Can I raise objections about anything or will hacker mercenaries from BigCorp/BigState detonate my device in my hands or sleep?
[0]: https://youtube.com/watch?v=xlLDKVDl9gA&t=225 https://youtube.com/watch?v=xlLDKVDl9gA&t=225
- senectus1 2y agothat video is very interesting but again, we're talking about much higher density forms of energy storage than phones and bluetooth headphones and nothing like the "BANG" of the pagers with actual explosives in them. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYmuK_pLIbQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYmuK_pLIbQ